histolytica specific primers, Lane 1 = Marker 100 bp, Lane 2 = EhHM1 genomic DNA as positive control, Lane 3 & 4 stool sample DNA, Lane 5 = Genomic DNA of E. dispar SAW760 as negative control. Sample in lane 4 is E. histolytica positive; (D) Detection of E. dispar in Stool sample using E. dispar specific primers. Lane 1 = Marker 1
kb, Lane 2,3,4 and 5 stool sample DNA, Lane 6 = Genomic DNA of E. dispar as positive control. Sample in Lane 3 and 5 are E. dispar positive. Lane 4 stool sample is E. histolytica positive and was used as negative control. Primer designing for detection of MEK inhibitor predominant genera of gut flora Primer sets were designed to differentiate and quantitate the following major anaerobic genera –Bacteroides, Clostridium, Campylobacter, Bifidobacterium, Ruminococcus, Eubacterium, LY3009104 Lactobacillus, Methanobrevibacter and Sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB).16S rRNA gene was targeted for designing primers except for SRB (Table 1). Sulphate reducing gene was targeted for quantifying members of SRB. Primers were commercially obtained from Sigma-aldrich, USA. Table 1 Genus specific 16S rRNA targeted bacterial primers used in this study Sr no. Genus Primer sequence PCR Product (bp) Tm(ºC) References 1. Methanobrevibactr F 5’- CGATGCGGACTTGGTGTTG-3’
184 59.7 [21] R 5’-TGTCGCCTCTGGTGAGATGTC-3’ 59.8 2. Peptostreptococcus F 5’-AACTCCGGTGGTATCAGATG-3’ 270 55.4 [1] R 5’-GGGGCTTCTGAGTCAGGTA-3’ 56.4 3. Ruminococcus F 5’-GAAAGCGTGGGGAGCAAACAGG-3’ 302 65.8 [21] R 5’- GACGACAACCATGCACCACCTG-3’ 64.4 4. Eubacterium F 5’-GTAGTCCACGCCGTAAACGATG-3’ 278 60.4 [21] R 5’-ACACGAGCTGACGACAACCATG-3’ 62.4 5. Bacteroides F 5’- GGGGTTCTGAGAGGAAG-3’ RG7112 cell line 115 54.0 [21] R 5’- GCTACTTGGCTGGTTCAG-3’ 56.0 6. Lactobacillus F 5’-GCAGCAGTAGGGAATCTTCCA-3’ 340 64.0 [25] R 5’-GCATTYCACCGCTACACATG-3’ 58.0 7. Clostridium leptum subgroup F 5’-CGTCAGCTCGTGTCGTGAGAT-3’ 125 60.0 [21] R 5’-CGTCATCCCCACCTTCCTCC-3’ 62.5 8. Clostridium coccoides subgroup F 5’-GCCACATTGGGACTGAGA-3’ 170 56.0 This study R 5’-GCTTCTTAGTCAGGTACCG-3’ 58.0 9. Campylobacter F 5’-AGGGAATATTGCGCAATGGGGGAAA-3’ 180 58.0
[21] R 5’- GATTCCGAGTAACGCTTGCACCCT-3’ 59.0 10. Bifidobacterium F 5’-GATTCTGGCTCAGGATGAACGC-3’ 231 61.9 [21] R 5’-CTGATAGGACGCGACCCCAT-3’ Nutlin3 60.8 11. Sulfate-reducing bacteria (APS reductase subunit A gene) F 5’-TGGCAGATMATGATYMACGG-3’ 396 54. This study R 5’-GGCCGTAACCGTCCTTGAA-3’ 54.0 Primers for detection and quantification of nim gene Primers were designed from nim gene after Stephanie Trinh et al. [14]. Primer sequences were as follows; NIM-F (5’-ATGTTCAGAGAAATGCGGCGTAAGCG-3’) and NIM-R (5’-GCTTCCTTGCCTGTCAT GTGCTC-3’). Primers Nim-F and Nim-R designed by us amplify all the members of nim gene family viz. nimA, nimB, nimC, nimD and nimE. Primers were commercially synthesized from Sigma-Aldrich, USA. Primers NIM-F&R did not amplify genomic DNA derived from axenic culture of E.