, 2009; Hanslmayr et al., 2009), i.e., a component linked to successful recollection (Mecklinger, 2000). The current data suggest that this selective attenuation during direct suppression may reflect inhibited hippocampal processing.

On the other hand, precluding awareness of unwanted memories by recalling substitute memories was associated with increased activation in left cPFC and mid-VLPFC. Thus, this task recruited those regions that we hypothesized to support a mechanism of thought substitution. The two areas have respectively been implicated in the retrieval of weak memories in the context of interfering, stronger memories (Wimber et al., 2008) and in the postretrieval selection between active memory representations LY294002 supplier (Kuhl et al., 2008; Badre and Wagner, 2007). Our data indicate that when thought substitution is challenging due to increased interference from unwanted memories, the functional connectivity of these regions is greater. We observed a stronger coupling for individuals who found it more difficult to recall the alternative memory while keeping the avoided memory out of mind. This

increased coupling Selleck Talazoparib may reflect a greater demand on control processes necessary to retrieve and select the substitute in the presence of an involuntarily recalled memory. Conversely, the connectivity was weaker for individuals who successfully forgot more of the suppressed memories. Thus, these regions are more tightly coupled in case of greater experienced

competition, but less coupled in case of greater forgetting, i.e., in situations when the avoided memories do not interfere with the substitutes. This pattern is consistent with our hypothesis that precluding awareness of unwanted memories by substitution engages Non-specific serine/threonine protein kinase a mechanism of competition resolution mediated by left cPFC-mid-VLPFC interactions. Moreover, these regions were more strongly engaged in individuals that also showed greater hippocampal activation during substitution attempts. If, in this context, greater HC activation can indeed be taken to reflect the concurrent retrieval of the two competing memory traces (Kuhl et al., 2007; Wimber et al., 2009), this suggests a functional link between retrieval processes supported by the HC and retrieval selection processes mediated by cPFC and mid-VLPFC. During thought substitution, competition from an unwanted memory may be attenuated by a direct and selective weakening of the interfering memory, which, in turn, would render it inaccessible during later retrieval attempts (Storm and Nestojko, 2010). Alternatively, competition may be attenuated by selectively strengthening the substitute thought, making it easier to access and occupy awareness.