59 (0 71–9 42) 0 148 – –  Clinical remissiond 0 35 (0 08–1 57) 0

59 (0.71–9.42) 0.148 – –  Clinical remissiond 0.35 (0.08–1.57) 0.170 – – At baseline  Age (years) 1.04 (0.99–1.08) 0.092 1.00 (0.94–1.06) >0.2  Femaled 1.06 (0.36–3.16) >0.2 – –  Current smokingd 3.96 (1.33–11.8) 0.013# 1.27 (0.28–5.58) >0.2  BP ≥130/80 mmHgd 1.31 (0.36–4.79) >0.2 – –  UPE (g/day) 2.09 (1.43–3.07) <0.001# –e –e  U-RBC ≥30/hpfd 0.22 (0.06–0.79) Hormones antagonist 0.021# 0.34 (0.06–1.99) >0.2

 eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 d 11.5 (2.55–52.3) 0.002# 24.3 (2.72–217) 0.004# Concurrent treatment  Tonsillectomyd 0.37 (0.11–1.21) 0.099 1.23 (0.27–5.55) >0.2  RAAS inhibitorsd 2.06 (0.67–6.29) >0.2 – – HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, UPE urinary protein excretion, U-RBC urinary sediments of red blood cells, NE not enrolled in the multivariate model, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, RAAS renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system aIf the p value of the variable was <0.1 in the univariate model, the predictor was selected for the multivariate model bThe category is shown in Table 2 cReference = Severe category dYes versus no eAs it was related to category of UPE at 1 year (see Table 2), it was not enrolled in the multivariate model # p < 0.05 Significance of UPE <0.4 g/day as a predictor when the renal survival was

adjusted for pathological parameters The predictive value of UPE <0.4 g/day at 1 year for the outcome when adjusted for pathological parameters in the Oxford buy Lazertinib classification and “HG” from Japan was examined by the univariate and multivariate models and the

data are summarized in Table 4. The univariate analysis revealed that the existence of endocapillary hypercellularity (E1) was significantly click here associated with a preferable renal survival relative to the absence of endocapillary hypercellularity second (E0). T1 or T2 tubular atrophy/interstitial fibrosis was significantly associated with impaired renal survival relative to T0. In addition, HG 2 was significantly associated with favorable renal outcome relative to HG 3 plus HG 4. Although HG 1 was not significantly associated with favorable outcome, no event was observed in 32 patients of HG 1. Table 4 Pathological predictors and UPE <0.4 g/day at 1 year for a 50 % increase in the serum creatinine level from baseline in the Cox model Predictors Univariate model Multivariate model A Multivariate model B HR (95 % CI) p value HR (95 % CI) p value HR (95 % CI) p value Oxford classification  M1 versus M0 0.93 (0.24–3.61) >0.2 – – – –  E1 versus E0 0.23 (0.06–0.89) 0.033# 0.44 (0.10–1.91) >0.2 – –  S1 versus S0 2.03 (0.26–16.0) >0.2 – – – –  T1 versus T0 6.97 (1.66–29.2) 0.008# 4.35 (1.02–18.5) 0.047# – –  T2 versus T0 12.8 (2.12–77.1) 0.005# 19.1 (2.55–144) 0.004# – –  Ext, present versus absent 0.44 (0.09–2.06) >0.2 – – – – HG  HG1 versus HG3 + 4 0.00 (0.00–100<) >0.2 – – 0.00 (0.00–100<) >0.2  HG2 versus HG3 + 4 0.24 (0.06–0.92) 0.038# – – 0.36 (0.08–1.51) 0.161 UPE at 1 year <0.4 g/daya 0.10 (0.03–0.36) <0.001# 0.08 (0.01–0.45) 0.004# 0.06 (0.01–0.29) 0.

Comments are closed.