At a time when there were two main models for revalidation: the medical one, using appraisals, and the dental model, focussing on CPD, the GPhC commissioned research to evaluate the utility of appraisals and alternative sources of evidence in pharmacy. This involved qualitative interviews and surveys with stakeholders in community, hospital, pharmaceutical industry, and academia, each from the perspective of registrants and those who may play a role in revalidation, particularly employers and indeed the regulator.(8-12) With pharmacy professionals working in a variety of sectors, Selleck AZD2281 with most in direct patient
contact, it became clear that the options and requirements for different professionals in different sectors and organisations varied. Appraisals were common in the managed sector, but some (e.g. owners, locums, portfolio workers) were not covered. Appraisals may not be fit-for-purpose, as focus was organisational (business targets in community and industry; teaching/research in academia). Other than in NHS sectors, appraisals NSC 683864 molecular weight did not address competence or fitness-to-practise, and were often conducted by non-pharmacists. Concerns over independence of assessment and the role of employers were raised. It is also worth
noting that revalidation is not just for pharmacists but also pharmacy technicians, which leads onto the next ‘big question’. At a time of debate in the profession about supervision, and the start of a programme to rebalance medicines legislation and pharmacy regulation, Pharmacy Research UK commissioned a study entitled ‘supervision in community pharmacy’. Its aim was to explore the role of skill mix and effective role delegation to enable pharmacists’ increasing clinical, patient-centred roles. A method called nominal group technique was used to identify which pharmacy activities could or could not be safely performed by appropriately trained support staff during a pharmacist’s
PtdIns(3,4)P2 2-hour absence. Views were explored in qualitative discussions, followed by a large scale survey of pharmacists and pharmacy technicians in community and hospital.(13;14) Safe, borderline and unsafe activities were identified, with borderline activities crucial for the flow of tasks involving more than one activity (e.g. cascade of dispensing). Community pharmacists were most reluctant to relinquish control, with trust in, and familiarity with, the team being important. Challenges underpinning effective delegation centred on clear roles, responsibilities and accountability, and quality of staff training and competence, with pharmacy technicians the most likely group to take on extended roles. My lecture will lay out the importance of research informing teaching and learning, policy, practice and regulation, illustrated through the context of big questions, the detail of addressing these and some of the key findings.