) Figure 1 Subsystem matches in the nitrogen metabolism category. The proportional

numbers of environmental gene tags that matched with level 2 sequences within the nitrogen metabolism subsystem category for the +NO3- (solid bars) and –N (open bars) metagenomes. No significant differences were found when these sequences were analyzed with Fisher exact tests in the Statistical Analysis of Metagenomic Profiles program. Table 2 Nitrogen metabolism gene matches and the number of sequences from the +NO 3 – metagenome that matched with the genes, as determined with a BLASTN comparison Query sequence1 N Metabolism gene # Database sequences Average%ID Average alignment length Average E-value +NO3- seq. 1 napA 3 92.83 65 7.33E-18 +NO3- seq. 2 napA 125 83.83 131.29 9.86E-08 find more   napB 1 82.35 119 4.00E-11 1The query sequence indicates that only two sequences out of 28,688

in the +NO3- metagenome matched with sequences in the N metabolism database. Seq. 1 matched with three database entries, while seq. 2 matched with 126 database entries. EGT matches to other subsystems found with the BLASTX comparison to the SEED database, however, changed significantly between the treatments (Figure 2, Table 1, and Additional file 1: Tables S1-S4). EGTs that matched with genes in the categories of iron acquisition and metabolism, cell D-malate dehydrogenase division CB-5083 supplier and cell cycle, RNA metabolism, and protein metabolism were GW 572016 proportionally higher in the –N metagenome (Figure 2). The +NO3- metagenome contained a higher relative number of EGT matches to genes in the fatty acids, lipids, and isoprenoids, stress response, and carbohydrates categories (Figure 2). Lower level metabolic EGT matches within these categories that were significantly different between the metagenomes are listed in Table 1. Figure 2 Significant subsystem differences between

the +NO 3 – and –N metagenomes. Results of a Fisher exact test (conducted with the Statistical Analysis of Metagenomic Profiles program) showing the significant differences of subsystem environmental gene tag (EGT) matches between treatments. Higher EGT relative abundance in the +NO3- metagenome have a positive difference between proportions (closed circles), while higher EGT relative abundance in the –N metagenome have a negative difference between proportions (open circles). At the phylum level, EGT matches to Acidobacteria, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Virrucomicrobia in the domain Bacteria and Streptophyta in the domain Eukaryota were proportionally higher in the +NO3- metagenome (Figure 3).