Life-threatening PTLD is known to be caused by the EBV virus (3). Frequent clinical manifestations of CMV are pneumonia and gastrointestinal disease (4). Because these viruses replicate without any clinical symptoms, quantitative methods are required to distinguish asymptomatic infection from impending diseases. Routine monitoring of these viruses and pre-emptive intervention for virus-associated diseases are therefore important (5, 6). Recently, quantitative real-time PCR assays have become widespread methods for diagnosing

and monitoring EBV-associated diseases after transplantation (5, 7). The CMV pp65 antigenemia assay has Sunitinib clinical trial been widely used to evaluate the viral load of CMV-associated diseases and is considered the gold standard. However, quantitative PCR is increasingly used in diagnosing and monitoring transplant recipients because of its speed, reproducibility, and Selleckchem Palbociclib ease of use (6, 8). Currently, laboratories rely on their own home-brew quantitative PCR assay system. These home-brew assay systems need to be standardized because discrepancies existing between laboratories

lead to site-specific patient management algorithms. Five independent laboratories comprised the working group in this study and compared the quantitative results of each home-brew assay and a prototype assay system to establish a standardized quantitative procedure for measuring EBV and CMV. Distributed reference standards and whole blood samples from solid organ transplantation and hematopoietic stem

cell transplantation recipients were used in this multicenter evaluation. Five MRIP independent laboratories comprised the working group of the Japan Molecular Center of Excellence sponsored by Roche Diagnostics K.K, each using a different quantitative home-brew EBV PCR assay. Each laboratory provided details of its home-brew testing procedure (Table 1). The prototype assay kit (JMCoE EBV primer probe standard set, CMV primer probe standard set, DNA master mix set; Nihon Gene Research Laboratories, Sendai, Japan) and the reference standard for EBV and CMV were developed by Roche Diagnostics K.K. (Tokyo, Japan) and distributed among the participating laboratories. In total, 642 (EBV) and 174 (CMV) whole blood samples from solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients as part of routine follow up after transplantation were studied retrospectively. The sample set for comparison was different among the participating sites: for EBV, 100 samples were used in site A, 100 in B, 240 in C, 72 in D, and 130 in E; for CMV, 103 in A and 71 in E. No samples were redundant among the participating sites. Each site carried out quantitative EBV and CMV testing on all reference standards and clinical samples using both their own home-brew procedure and the prototype test.