Results and discussion Production and purification of ASNase II As mentioned above, protein expression was carried out under conditions that were previously

optimized in our laboratory. The extract prepared by alkaline lysis was passed through a DEAE-Sepharose Fast Flow column. Table 2 shows a summary of the results, before and after purification. The total specific activity increased from 18.6 to Temsirolimus concentration 111.5 U/mg for the filtrate and the final preparation, respectively. About 81.5% of the original enzyme activity was recovered with a purification fold of 6. Purification was examined by SDS-PAGE following Coomassie brilliant blue staining (Figure 1). It revealed only a single distinctive protein band for the pure preparation of ASNase II with an apparent molecular weight of 35 kDa, corresponding to a monomer of the denatured enzyme. All known types of ASNase II are active as homotetramers with molecular mass of approximately 140 kDa, arranged as 222-symmetric assemblies around three mutually perpendicular dyads. The closest interactions between the A and C subunits (as well as selleck screening library between subunits B and D) lead to the formation

of two intimate dimmers within which the four non-allosteric catalytic centers are created. Such formation of tetramers, for reasons that are not completely clear, appears to be essential for the catalytic ability of ASNase II [26, 27]. Table 2 Purification table of ASNase II by DEAE-Sepharose Steps Volume (ml) Total protein (mg) Total activity (U) Specific activity (U/mg) Overall yield a (%) Purification fold Before purification (filtrate) 80 786.4 14,604.48 18.57 100 1 After purification (DEAE-Sepharose) 187 106.7 11,896.8 111.5 81.4 6.0 aYield = Total activity after purification/Total activity before purification. Figure 1 SDS- PAGE ( 15%) analysis of ASNase II purification using DEAE-Sepharose. Lane 1: protein marker. Lane 2: Crude extract of E. coli by alkaline lysis.

Lanes 3 to 11: purified ASNase II eluted from the DEAE-Sepharose column in selected fractions. Chloride (which would interfere with TPP in preparation of ionotropic nanoparticles) was STI571 eliminated from the DEAE-chromatographic product by Sephadex G-75 and the protein was lyophilized. At the high ionic triclocarban strengths, the CS-TPP binding would be weakened to the point that the nanoparticles would cease to form [28], due to the competitive reaction between Cl− and TPP ions for NH3 +. Preparation of ASNase II-loaded CSNPs ASNase II activity in CS and TPP solutions Both CS and TPP have their characteristic charge and may likely affect ASNase II stability and activity. The behavior of ASNase II in the CS and TPP solutions was individually investigated before preparation of nanoparticles. The percentages of the preserved ASNase II activity in CS and TPP were 85% and 80% of the activity of untreated enzyme, respectively. This result can be explained from the standpoint of pH.