We evaluated different respiratory mucosa immunization protocols that included the nasal administration of Lactococcus lactis-pneumococcal protective protein A (PppA) live, inactivated, and in association with a probiotic (Lc) to young mice. The animals that received Lc by the oral and nasal route presented the highest levels of immunoglobulin (Ig)A and IgG anti-PppA antibodies in bronchoalveolar lavages (BAL) and IgG in serum, which no doubt contributed to the protection against infection. However,

only the groups that received the live and inactivated vaccine associated RG7204 ic50 with the oral administration of the probiotic were able to prevent lung colonization by S. pneumoniae serotypes 3 and 14 in a respiratory infection model. This would be related to a preferential stimulation of the T helper type 1 (Th1) cells at local and systemic levels and with a moderate Th2 and Th17 response, shown by the cytokine profile induced in BAL and by the results of the IgG1/IgG2a ratio at local and systemic levels. Nasal immunization with the inactivated recombinant strain associated with oral Lc administration was able to stimulate the specific cellular and humoral immune response and afford protection against the challenge with the two S. pneumoniae serotypes. The results obtained show the probiotic-inactivated vaccine

association as a valuable alternative for application to human health, especially in at-risk populations, and are the first report of a safe and effective immunization BI 6727 order strategy using an inactivated recombinant strain. Streptococcus pneumoniae is an important respiratory pathogen with

high incidence in both developed and developing countries. Pneumococcal disease implies a significant economic burden to health care systems in Latin America [1]. Defence against pneumococcal infection involves innate and adaptive immune responses, and the control of these infections involves protective adaptive immunity through vaccine administration. However, pneumococcal vaccines available Galactosylceramidase at present do not constitute a definitive solution to this important health problem. This is because, while pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccines (PPV) have the potential to prevent disease and death, the degree of protection that they offer against different serotypes and within different populations is uncertain. In addition, while the new conjugate vaccines have shown effectiveness in young children, they do not represent a definitive solution. Protecting against those vaccine strains would give other pneumococcal strains the opportunity to cause infection and the impact of a pneumococcal vaccination programme would be reduced if serotype replacement were significant [2,3]. Moreover, the high cost of conjugate vaccines is one of the main reasons for the search for better immunization strategies against S. pneumoniae.