Anthropometric data (age, height, weight and body mass index) and D(m) and V(c) were assessed in 85 healthy Tunisian adults. Univariate and multiple linear regression analyses were used to determine reference equations ACY-738 Epigenetics inhibitor and to calculate the lower limit of the normal range (LLN). Results: The mean ages +/-SD (minimum – maximum) for male and female adults were 53 +/- 21 (21-85) and 42 +/- 16 (18-72) years, respectively. Previously published reference equations did not reliably
predict measured D(m) and V(c). The reference equation (r(2) = 47%) for D(m) was -36.16 + 45.37 x height -0.34 x age + 0.39 x weight + 7.41 x gender (0 = female and 1 = male). To calculate the D(m) LLN subtract 24.36 from the reference value. The reference equation (r(2) = 30%) for female V(c) was 94.70 -0.57 x age, and the reference equation (r(2) = 52%) for male V(c) was 0.82 -0.48 x age + 52.47 x height + 0.16 x weight. To calculate the V(c) LLN subtract 28.52 and 26.54 from these reference values for females and males, respectively. Conclusion: These V(c) and D(m) reference equations supplement the international World Bank of reference equations. Copyright (C)
2010 S. Karger AG, Basel”
“Objective: To identify the perception of the train passengers about the cause and the management of hearing loss.
Methodology: A total of 115 passengers, 90 males and 25 females, in the age range of 13-80 years (mean: 39.19, standard deviation: 15.4) years.
Results: From the survey, it is found that most of the participants (82.6%) had seen a person with hearing loss. Stem Cell Compound Library nmr Among them, 10 reported to have relatives who have hearing loss but did not know where
they should be taken for remedy. Seventeen individuals (all geriatric) were suspected to be having reduced heating acuity during the survey. However, none of them admitted to be having a significant disability due to hearing loss. Also 48% of the participants correctly attribute hearing loss to biological Salubrinal and environmental causes (genetic, congenital and noise induced causes) and three percent of them attributed it to myth revealing that most of the participants had awareness about what could cause hearing impairment. Regarding management, most of the participants (25.2%) agreed to medical treatment as the best, followed by hearing aids (23.5%). There were no myths related to management. Five of the participants interviewed, were already undergoing medical treatments from various medical institutions for their hearing impairment, but reported to have no benefit from the treatment. Among the participants who answered yes to question 4, most of them recognized Speech Language Pathologists as professionals who could manage speech difficulties but mostly attributed management of hearing impairment to an Ear Nose and Throat (ENT) specialist.